RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @AcsAgainstCRT: The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prage…
RT @geepradeep: A very well-written opinion by Prof. Anna Krylov on why politics cannot influence science in today's JPC Letters: https://t…
politicizing climate change is what caused so much damage. if we didn't have that tribalism we could have never had climate deniers or the sanctimonious people that rubbished the skeptics with unwarranted superiority. even the best causes can become the
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today!
RT @psobolewskiPhD: Really important and eloquent thread by @professor_dave 100% on the money. #SciComm #MakeScienceBetter https://t.co/OS…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
Yes, when Newton expounded his theory of gravitation and the laws of motion, he did it to obtain political power. Maxwell's equations were about strengthening the British Empire. Einstein's paper on Brownian motion was a naked bid for dictatorship. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
RT @AcsAgainstCRT: The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prage…
RT @psobolewskiPhD: Really important and eloquent thread by @professor_dave 100% on the money. #SciComm #MakeScienceBetter https://t.co/OS…
Really important and eloquent thread by @professor_dave 100% on the money. #SciComm #MakeScienceBetter
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
@BretWeinstein The perils of politicising science : https://t.co/2qR8QKwvIY…
RT @rgraucrespo: Cancelling scientists - by Anna Krylov. Perhaps because I also come from a communist country where ideology dominated ever…
This thread is exactly right.
RT @curryja: Must read: On the Peril of Politicizing Science, by a scientist of the Soviet Union. https://t.co/VBWaNB33Ow
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @ConceptualJames: A must-read. On the Peril of Politicizing Science, from a scientist and survivor of the Soviet Union. https://t.co/C8l…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
@bschillace
"The Peril of Politicizing Science": https://t.co/xT7FKXppJY “When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.” -- Thomas Sowell.
RT @AcsAgainstCRT: The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prage…
RT @curiouswavefn: It takes courage to write this kind of piece in today’s environment and I applaud Prof. Anna Krylov for it. https://t.co…
RT @AcsAgainstCRT: The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prage…
Incredibly important article.
RT @AcsAgainstCRT: The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prage…
A must read for my science and politics fellows.
RT @AcsAgainstCRT: The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prage…
The Peril of Politicizing Science @BretWeinstein @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @wokal_distance @HeatherEHeying @prageru @UofOklahoma @OU_President https://t.co/qzLwmgexxK
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @curryja: Must read: On the Peril of Politicizing Science, by a scientist of the Soviet Union. https://t.co/VBWaNB33Ow
1) why the fuck is this pro-empire garbage in a scientific journal? 2) why do these snowflakes care so much that equations are named after some old German? 3) lol at science being a meritocracy 4) scientists think that all politics are the same which is ho
RT @philipcball: So where am I going to start? Perhaps by saying that yes, the ideological censoring of science under Stalin and Hitler was…
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
We need more heroes like Anna Krylov in our universities. https://t.co/mh5yKbZ8f5
RT @yudapearl: Truly superb article on "The Peril of Politicizing Science" from a colleague (Chemistry professor) at USC https://t.co/1gzzQ…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
Disappointed in everyone involved in this nonsense. "Detailed balance limit" is an objectively better name than "Shockley–Queisser limit." The former tells you something about the science; the latter is the vanity of a vile racist. https://t.co/aeGLKXQ10I
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
The Peril of Politicizing Science | The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters https://t.co/LtOik7HVzw
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today!
RT @DrRubidium: 🧵
RT @CognitiveEmpat1: @MartinKulldorff @jevinwest "Normalizing ideological intrusion into science and abandoning Mertonian principles will c…
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @donnainfiorino: 👇👇👇
Great thread. I fully agree
RT @curryja: Must read: On the Peril of Politicizing Science, by a scientist of the Soviet Union. https://t.co/VBWaNB33Ow
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @CognitiveEmpat1: @MartinKulldorff @jevinwest "Normalizing ideological intrusion into science and abandoning Mertonian principles will c…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @yudapearl: Truly superb article on "The Peril of Politicizing Science" from a colleague (Chemistry professor) at USC https://t.co/1gzzQ…
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @watermicrobe: Please read this excellent thread.
Indeed, in her article, Krylova also points out how "Mere compliance was not sufficient". https://t.co/xPvZQjvkeK
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
Politicization of science is wrong. Science seeks out truth and is willing to change with evidence to do so. It’s the human scientists that politicize science. Just because science is politicized throughout history doesn’t mean that science itself is polit
RT @CognitiveEmpat1: @MartinKulldorff @jevinwest "Normalizing ideological intrusion into science and abandoning Mertonian principles will c…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science https://t.co/lzgYCqLAxQ
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @CognitiveEmpat1: @MartinKulldorff @jevinwest "Normalizing ideological intrusion into science and abandoning Mertonian principles will c…
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science https://t.co/lzgYCqLAxQ
RT @ConceptualJames: Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
Lol former editor of Nature wants you to believe everything is fine when you politicize science
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today…
I have troubles with spoilt western activists who were born into a political postmodern cult and hence never quite grasped the concept of science, but still call themselves scientists and spread their pseudowisdoms on campuses. Exactly what Lenin and Grams
Politics instrumentalise science, duh. That doesn’t make science political any more than using a screwdriver as a hammer makes it a hammer, Professor Fuckwit
RT @tiagopeixoto: An excellent text about a crucial point that should be more widely understood: censorship has *always* been justified by…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
Do YOU, @professor_dave, agree that genetics, cybernetics, QM, and general relativity are “bourgeois sciences” that should not be studied? If not, WHICH sciences do YOU say should not be studied because of their erroneous politics?
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
“Notable examples of 'bourgeois pseudo-science' included genetics and cybernetics. Quantum mechanics and general relativity were also criticized for insufficient alignment with dialectic materialism.”
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
RT @professor_dave: This paper argues against 'politicisation of science'. It's a seductive idea that science has been apolitical and thing…
You are an Activist, and your Theology of Wokeism has no place but for "Political" Science.
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today!
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today…
This is a LIE. It is a bait and switch, or a motte and bailey. It equivocates between “science has relevance to politics” and “science is subordinate to politics.”
RT @raja00710: Machine Learning Bot Retweeted Judea Pearl @yudapearl · 7h Truly superb article on "The Peril of Politicizing Science" from…
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today…
RT @ConceptualJames: Found an activist pretending to be a scientist in science who we'll learn more about on my podcast release later today…
RT @yudapearl: Truly superb article on "The Peril of Politicizing Science" from a colleague (Chemistry professor) at USC https://t.co/1gzzQ…
RT @yudapearl: Truly superb article on "The Peril of Politicizing Science" from a colleague (Chemistry professor) at USC https://t.co/1gzzQ…
RT @DrRubidium: 🧵