| Title |
Effect of the U‑Shaped Cavity of Conformationally Flexible Chiral Lewis-Acidic Boron-Based Catalysts in Multiselective Diels–Alder Reactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Organic Letters, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatsuhiro Sakamoto, Kohei Toh, Kai Matsui, Manabu Hatano, Kazuaki Ishihara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,590,932
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Organic Letters
#4,780
of 15,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,511
of 198,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Organic Letters
#49
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.