↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Improving the Mechanical Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks Using Chemical Caryatids

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Central Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Improving the Mechanical Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks Using Chemical Caryatids
Published in
ACS Central Science, June 2018
DOI 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seyed Mohamad Moosavi, Peter G. Boyd, Lev Sarkisov, Berend Smit

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as versatile materials for applications ranging from gas separation and storage, catalysis, and sensing. The attractive feature of MOFs is that, by changing the ligand and/or metal, they can be chemically tuned to perform optimally for a given application. In most, if not all, of these applications one also needs a material that has a sufficient mechanical stability, but our understanding of how changes in the chemical structure influence mechanical stability is limited. In this work, we rationalize how the mechanical properties of MOFs are related to framework bonding topology and ligand structure. We illustrate that the functional groups on the organic ligands can either enhance the mechanical stability through formation of a secondary network of nonbonded interactions or soften the material by destabilizing the bonded network of a MOF. In addition, we show that synergistic effect of the bonding network of the material and the secondary network is required to achieve optimal mechanical stability of a MOF. The developed molecular insights in this work can be used for systematic improvement of the mechanical stability of the materials by careful selection of the functional groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 22%
Chemical Engineering 14 12%
Engineering 9 8%
Materials Science 6 5%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 49 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#650,309
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from ACS Central Science
#199
of 1,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,699
of 328,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Central Science
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.