| Title |
DNAzyme-Based Lithium-Selective Imaging Reveals Higher Lithium Accumulation in Bipolar Disorder Patient-Derived Neurons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Central Science, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00843 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire E. McGhee, Zhenglin Yang, Weijie Guo, Yuting Wu, Mingkuan Lyu, Cynthia J. DeLong, Shanni Hong, Yuan Ma, Melvin G. McInnis, K. Sue O’Shea, Yi Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 42% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#676,890
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from ACS Central Science
#211
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,158
of 435,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Central Science
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.