| Title |
Proximity-Induced Nucleic Acid Degrader (PINAD) Approach to Targeted RNA Degradation Using Small Molecules
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Central Science, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sigitas Mikutis, Maria Rebelo, Eliza Yankova, Muxin Gu, Cong Tang, Ana R. Coelho, Mo Yang, Madoka E. Hazemi, Marta Pires de Miranda, Maria Eleftheriou, Max Robertson, George S. Vassiliou, David J. Adams, J. Pedro Simas, Francisco Corzana, John S. Schneekloth, Konstantinos Tzelepis, Gonçalo J. L. Bernardes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 27% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Portugal | 3 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 57% |
| Scientists | 21 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 15 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#562,230
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from ACS Central Science
#179
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,496
of 411,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Central Science
#7
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.