↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Fast Separation, Characterization, and Speciation of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles and Their Ionic Counterparts with Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography Coupled to ICP-MS

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Chemistry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Fast Separation, Characterization, and Speciation of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles and Their Ionic Counterparts with Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography Coupled to ICP-MS
Published in
Analytical Chemistry, June 2014
DOI 10.1021/ac403998e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bastian Franze, Carsten Engelhard

Abstract

In this study, a method for separation, size characterization, and speciation of gold and silver nanoparticles was developed through the use of micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) coupled to inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the first time. Figures of merit in this proof-of-principle study include peak area precision of 4-6%, stable migration times (1.4% with internal standard), and capillary recoveries on the order of 72-100% depending on species and nanoparticle size, respectively. Detection limits are currently in the sub-microgram per liter range. For example, a total of 1500 50-nm-sized gold nanoparticles were successfully detected. After careful optimization, MEKC-ICP-MS was used to separate engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) of different composition. Speciation analysis of ENPs and free metal ions in solution was feasible using a complexing agent (penicillamine). Gold speciation analysis of a dietary supplement, which contained approximately 6-nm-sized gold nanoparticles, was demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 31%
Researcher 12 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 41 44%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Chemistry
#20,001
of 26,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,208
of 228,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Chemistry
#186
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.