↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Overview of attention for article published in Human & Experimental Toxicology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,449)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5762 X users
facebook
1042 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
39 Google+ users
reddit
8 Redditors
pinterest
13 Pinners
q&a
3 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
Published in
Human & Experimental Toxicology, May 2011
DOI 10.1177/0960327111407644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil Z Miller, Gary S Goldman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,762 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 132 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Other 21 15%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 41 29%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,030
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Human & Experimental Toxicology
#1
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 124,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human & Experimental Toxicology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them