↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Overview of attention for article published in Human & Experimental Toxicology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,443)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5753 X users
facebook
1042 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
39 Google+ users
reddit
8 Redditors
pinterest
13 Pinners
q&a
3 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
Published in
Human & Experimental Toxicology, May 2011
DOI 10.1177/0960327111407644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil Z Miller, Gary S Goldman

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,753 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 134 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Other 21 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 41 28%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,029
of 26,774,533 outputs
Outputs from Human & Experimental Toxicology
#1
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 125,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human & Experimental Toxicology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,774,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them