↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Taming the Strength of Interfacial Interactions via Nanoconfinement

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Central Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Taming the Strength of Interfacial Interactions via Nanoconfinement
Published in
ACS Central Science, June 2018
DOI 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00240
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Nieto Simavilla, Weide Huang, Caroline Housmans, Michele Sferrazza, Simone Napolitano

Abstract

The interaction between two immiscible materials is related to the number of contacts per unit area formed by the two materials. For practical reasons, this information is often parametrized by the interfacial free energy, which is commonly derived via rather cumbersome approaches, where properties of the interface are described by combining surface parameters of the single materials. These combining rules, however, neglect any effect that geometry might have on the strength of the interfacial interaction. In this Article, we demonstrate that the number of contacts at the interface between a thin polymer coating and its supporting substrate is altered upon confinement at the nanoscale level. We show that explicitly considering the effect of nanoconfinement on the interfacial potential allows a quantitative prediction of how sample geometry affects the number of contacts formed at the interface between two materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 11 26%
Chemistry 10 23%
Physics and Astronomy 7 16%
Chemical Engineering 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#760,035
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from ACS Central Science
#230
of 1,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,615
of 336,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Central Science
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.