↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Article Metrics

A Dual−Ion Battery Cathode via Oxidative Insertion of Anions in a Metal–Organic Framework

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
A Dual−Ion Battery Cathode via Oxidative Insertion of Anions in a Metal–Organic Framework
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, October 2015
DOI 10.1021/jacs.5b08022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L. Aubrey, Jeffrey R. Long

Abstract

A redox-active metal-organic framework, Fe2(dobpdc) (dobpdc(4-) = 4,4'-dioxidobiphenyl-3,3'-dicarboxylate), is shown to undergo a topotactic oxidative insertion reaction with a variety of weakly coordinating anions, including BF4(-) and PF6(-). The reaction results in just a minor lattice contraction and a broad intervalence charge transfer band emerges indicative of charge mobility. Although both metal- and ligand-based oxidations can be accessed, only the former were found to be fully reversible and, importantly, proceed stoichiometrically under both chemical and electrochemical conditions. Electrochemical measurements probing the effects of nanoconfinement on the insertion reaction revealed strong anion size and solvent dependences. Significantly, the anion insertion behavior of Fe2(dobpdc) enabled its use in the construction of a dual-ion battery prototype incorporating a sodium anode. As a cathode, the material displays a particularly high initial reduction potential and is further stable for at least 50 charge/discharge cycles, exhibiting a maximum specific energy of 316 Wh/kg.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 29%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 89 50%
Materials Science 23 13%
Chemical Engineering 8 5%
Energy 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 35 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,707,562
of 16,312,362 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#9,541
of 52,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,727
of 287,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#121
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,312,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.