Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030
Environmental Science & Technology, September 2018
Dan Tong, Qiang Zhang, Fei Liu, Guannan Geng, Yixuan Zheng, Tao Xue, Chaopeng Hong, Ruili Wu, Yu Qin, Hongyan Zhao, Liu Yan, Kebin He
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||8||73%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||24||22%|
|Student > Bachelor||11||10%|
|Student > Master||7||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||8||7%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||3||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
of 19,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 344,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.