↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
382 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
DOI 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arlene Blum, Mamta Behl, Linda S. Birnbaum, Miriam L. Diamond, Allison Phillips, Veena Singla, Nisha S. Sipes, Heather M. Stapleton, Marta Venier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 82 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 39 16%
Environmental Science 38 15%
Engineering 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 99 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#275,640
of 26,036,664 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#81
of 998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,898
of 375,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,036,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.