↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Article Metrics

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 705)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
DOI 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arlene Blum, Mamta Behl, Linda S. Birnbaum, Miriam L. Diamond, Allison Phillips, Veena Singla, Nisha S. Sipes, Heather M. Stapleton, Marta Venier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 24 22%
Environmental Science 18 16%
Engineering 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 33 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#205,760
of 20,009,828 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#48
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,181
of 345,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,009,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.