| Title |
Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arlene Blum, Mamta Behl, Linda S. Birnbaum, Miriam L. Diamond, Allison Phillips, Veena Singla, Nisha S. Sipes, Heather M. Stapleton, Marta Venier |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Sweden | 2 | 7% |
| Latvia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 19% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 33 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 15% |
| Engineering | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 73 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#283,049
of 23,989,683 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#73
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,474
of 361,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.