↓ Skip to main content

American Chemical Society

Article Metrics

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology Letters, October 2019
DOI 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arlene Blum, Mamta Behl, Linda S. Birnbaum, Miriam L. Diamond, Allison Phillips, Veena Singla, Nisha S. Sipes, Heather M. Stapleton, Marta Venier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 41 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 19%
Environmental Science 28 17%
Engineering 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 55 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#259,126
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#67
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,283
of 357,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology Letters
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.